Skip to main content

Apple

The iPhone SE rumored to be a Trojan Horse with 6s specs in a 5s frame

posted onMarch 18, 2016
by l33tdawg

According to sources who spoke with 9to5Mac, the incoming iPhone SE will not be a smaller iPhone 6 — at least aesthetically.

It seems there will be some holdovers from both the iPhone 5s and 6 in the SE, though. The overall dimensions are said to be the same as the iPhone 5s, but the curved edges won’t be shiny.

The cover glass may be rounded at the edges, but it seems the curvature is so slight it’s indistinguishable. Other components of the SE’s hardware — like the headphone jack, power button and volume buttons — will be just as you find them on the iPhone 5s.

Apple fires back: “Government is adept at devising new surveillance techniques”

posted onMarch 16, 2016
by l33tdawg

In its final court filing before oral arguments scheduled for next week, Apple argued that the government’s interpretation of an obscure 18th-Century law goes too far, and it should not be able to authorize the forced creation of a customized iOS firmware to aid in the opening of a seized iPhone linked to a 2015 terrorist attack.

In a Tuesday call with reporters, Apple lawyers said that this case is serious and has profound implications. The company largely re-iterated many of its previous arguments in earlier filings, ending with this conclusion:

Apple announces 21 March event, iPhone 5SE and new iPad expected

posted onMarch 11, 2016
by l33tdawg

SURPRISE, SURPRISE. Apple has announced that it will hold an event on 21 March at which we'll no doubt see the launch of the iPhone 5SE, a new iPad Pro and new Apple Watch models.

The invitation is typically mysterious. 'Let me loop you in,' it reads, which is perhaps a nod at the new Apple Watch bands expected at the event, while the colour scheme could also be a hint that the rumoured iPhone 5SE will be available in the same colours as the iPhone 6S.

Supremes tell Apple to shut up and face the music

posted onMarch 9, 2016
by l33tdawg

The highest court in the US has told the fruity cargo cult that Steve Jobs really was a monopolist who set up price cartel and it is going to have to deal with the consequences of his actions.

The Supreme Court officially declined to hear Apple challenge to an appellate court decision that it conspired with five publishers to increase e-book prices, meaning it will have to pay $450 million as part of a settlement.

Six months in, Google’s apps still don’t fully support iOS 9

posted onMarch 9, 2016
by l33tdawg

Google updated its Docs and Sheets productivity apps on Tuesday to support the iPad Pro's larger screen resolution. As you might recall from our iPad Pro review, iOS apps that don't properly support Apple's guidelines for resolution-independent apps will look stretched out and slightly blurry on an iPad Pro, much like an iPhone 5 app would look larger and blurry on an iPhone 6.

Apple rumored to debut OLED iPhone in 2017

posted onMarch 3, 2016
by l33tdawg

According to sources familiar with Apple's business dealings, the company reached out to South Korean display suppliers LG and Samsung in December to discuss the viability of ramping up OLED production in time for next year's iPhone launch, Nikkei reports. Along with the two tech companies, Apple also informed the appropriate industry associations of the potential change.

Apple Reissues Security Update After Blocking Ethernet on Mac OS X

posted onMarch 3, 2016
by l33tdawg

Apple over the weekend reissued a security update for OS X El Capitan systems after the initial update blocked Apple’s own Ethernet drivers.

The initial security update, which was installed on systems automatically in the background, was meant as a security measure designed to block kernel extensions that were harmful to the operating system. Apple issued the update to blacklist problematic kernel extensions, but mistakenly included the kernel extension information for its Ethernet drivers in it.

iCloud Backups Not as Secure as iOS Devices to Make Restoring Data Easier

posted onMarch 3, 2016
by l33tdawg

Apple's ongoing fight with the FBI over whether the company can be compelled to help the government unlock the iPhone 5c used by San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook has brought the full range of Apple's privacy policies into the spotlight.

The details surrounding the case have made it clear that while Apple is unable to access information on iOS devices, the same is not true of iCloud backups. Apple can decrypt an iCloud backup and provide the information to authorities when ordered to do so via a warrant, as it did in the San Bernardino case.